Kategorie: Nepal

  • Voices from the South

    A guest article from Radha Paudel originally published on her blog

    Dear Greta and Djaffar, Namaste!
    Let me first congratulate both of you., I (Anupa, Mili, Radha like to call I henceforth) am simply moved with the stories of you both. I have no words that would explain how much I admire you both. 

    Recently, my vision blurred when I saw your donation to one of the UN agency. I broke. Literally, I broke. You are repeating a mistake, simply repeating. 

    I do understand your emotional pain, you inspired the photos/videos of children with gasping especially from Asia and Africa. I have immense respect for your kindness, compassion, and empathy that ultimately wants to decrease poverty, and the consequences resulting from poverty. Sadly, you are contributing to increasing poverty instead of eliminating it.
    I do know that you will not be happy with this letter, and I worry that this will break you. This particular agency is just an example. All UNs, many INGOs, and few NGOs fall into the same category. In order to avoid pointing fingers at one organization, I like to use the word of a development agency (DA) henceforth. Let me explain though it is not as new as Corona virus. It is an open secret but rarely mentioned especially in the global north. 

    Poverty increment

    Do you know the operation cost of these DAs?  Do you know who is working there? Do you know who gets the access to work there and why? Do you know how much salary they get? I do not like to explain everything here. You are better to calculate than me.
    I only like to say that the people who are working there, are not exceptional people like you. They are the average people or may be less than average with other means for access to success. They graduate from the same schools with the same excellence. Definitely, there are not opportunities for all graduates who want to join there. Because of the irrational privileges provided by DA, the economic and social status changes after a few years. Eventually, the irreversible category formed and operated as modern poverty. Your donation played a role to divide the society at large. Here, your contribution doesn’t reach the poor children who are floating over the internet either from Asia or Africa.  

    Merely reached to the poor people

    Here, your donation is on the way to reach the poor people but how much, and where? Could you ever confirm that your donation addressed the underlying cause of poverty or climate crisis or breaking the vicious circle between them. Do you know how long that program has been launched? Do you ever calculate the amount of dollars that actually reached the poor? Do you know how many stories are taken from them and to where it displayed? Do you know of their humiliating experience they have to go through? Do you compare the remuneration between the top level of employees and employee/volunteers who are reaching the poor family, finally? Those volunteers are working under hostile weathers, with no good shoes, no food and so many things but they do not get anything or merely a droplet. That droplet does not have the capacity of mutation as a novel Coronavirus to enhance the capacity of livelihood of this family. They could be individuals, CSO workers who can’t speak English, do not have fair white skin, and living in a rural setting or anyone who represents the base of the pyramid. They have the same capacity to serve, to grow but they never get the opportunity for it. Their brains are washed in way that they are happy to work as volunteers; they are local, they do not know computers and English that is why their knowledge, skills and resilience are not written as a theory of change or log frame or strategies for project management and eventually they are waste people by virtue of fate. DAs are there for getting things done as documented or as taught by the Universities in the global north instead of needs and rights of people of the global south. DAs have been working for more than six decades but what is the impact of it at large? In conclusion, the poorer are poorer and richer are richer. Few locals who silently accept all instructions or puppetism, or showcase as principle of inclusion, are well off. The rest of them and their support disappeared after a while as a rainbow of evening.

    Liberation or dependency

    Do you ever think whether your goal of donation meets or not? Are you helping for liberation or dependence?  Why is it happening largely? Why the most of the poor people living with further poverty.  Do you think that strategies developed by DAs are useful or exploitative or empowering? Do you think the employees are compatible for the people, culture and all for achieving your goal? Do the indigenous coping and resilience mechanisms are recognized and maximization of its use?

    Contribute for corruption

    Are you aware your donations help to institutionalize the corruption? Are you aware about the deep and huge psychological tug of war between government and DAs? Having the same time and more or less results, the people in DAs are enjoying the substantial privileges and claim that they are coming from the moon as outstanding. The governments are not happy with the way of working by DAs and the DAs are not happy with the way of working by the government. There are so many stories under the carpet. There is no functional system to maintain integrity and a transparent system mostly from both sides due to the individual approach instead of system. After a while, DAs hook influential people in government by providing the opportunity to travel aboard or consultancy opportunity by taking leave or anything. The fancy reports produced with the photos/videos of government people but it is not by system or no accountability. It’s just temporary knots between government and DAs for the sake of formality which are not relevant or less relevant with the reality. Instead of being transparent and integrity, the DAs are busy making the system corrupt, paralysed and dependent. If you do not trust me, see the response against COVID-19, pandemic. The government authorities were made busy for 365 days by DAs before the COVID-19 but the result was almost zero.  It was not only now. Same was happen during the devastating earthquake 2015 and other countries from the global south. Because of their presence, so many local practices changed e.g. increased rental rates and majority of people cannot afford. In other side of the coin, the small NGO’s are battling for either arranging fake documents or writing fake reports. Most of them are unbale to produce same version of reports so they use the fund for hiring the consultants by manipulating the documents. In top of that, there was no fund for either operation cost or contribution of board members or both.

    Mis-interpretation

    Do you see the same level of understanding against the same condition or word? Have you ever thought that the operational definition of climate crisis or poverty is very different here than you think or experienced? Are you sure the foundation of yours and mine is the same? Do you consider the differences of contributing variables? Let me share one example. For you, bed and breakfast motel/hotel resemble attached toilet, hot and cold water, towels, tea sets at least. Your hotel is like a palace for me. In my country especially in rural setting, a hotel means a place for rest, could have toilet or not, common room where linens are used for more than a week and so many things. In contrast, the reports what you received are manipulated vastly as your desire in terms of words, frames and all. The poor people with the same status used three times differently like miserable condition, empower and miserable for proposal phase, reporting phase and re-proposal phase respectively. The consultants are hired for the proposal and report writing which is not based on reality but based on your requirements. They prepared a report like fiction Nobel. The same people write the different stories as your frameworks. In any community, there are outstanding personalities no matter whether it is Iran or Denmark or Sweden or Nepal. In Denmark or Sweden, any change in programming, changes the majority of the population but here only the changes took place who have potential already with or without opportunity or majority of population remain unchanged. 

    Way Forward

    Of course, the global south has other issues that weaken the systems like unstable government, conflicts, and traditional cultures. Now, the people like you urged the global community to act, not talk or nice words in speech. Meanwhile, the COVID-19, pandemic also accelerate the idea of reflecting and redefine the strategy for equal and better future that includes the paradigm shifting on DA too as follows;

    1.   Harmonization of minds: Psychological and structural hierarchy should avoid. The people who want to love ransom money, they are free to join business. Working in DAs is for passion to work in difficult areas or difficult tasks that should not trade off with money. If the mechanism is similar to the government, with same level of benefits, the change is easier, equal, faster and sustained as well.

    2. Poorer are leaders to alleviate poverty: To build the capacity of poor people and hold them accountable to them and their government, the donation should go directly to government or local NGOs/CSOs. They have the right to govern by themselves. Many scholars may claim that the government is corrupt or slow or anything. In a way and the other round, DAs keep saying such. As a result, the government not only boycotted but also weakened in many ways. DAs can develop mechanisms for transparency or monitoring their support.

    3. Celebration of contextual attributes: The poor people must be in the centre means their language, skills, knowledge should be acknowledged by DAs.  The reality and essence of reality should not twist or manipulate any more. One size does not fit all therefore, each community needs a different strategy. The frameworks, strategies and targets should revise according to the context.  Either in Denmark or Sweden, the Prime Ministers are running here and there with minimal or without security. Why do DAs need such security by spending the money at the name of the poor. The DAs are not reaching out to the real poor people and producing a new layer of poverty that should stop. The global community must be ready to unlearn.
    The donors, foundations, individuals are fatigued because of not having a significant impact against poverty. They are expecting the change or impact but do not try to understand the internal dynamics. They just fall in love with fancy photos/videos along with thank you letters. We know the world is complex, it does not move in a linear way thus its needs a multilinear approach to address too. Likewise, the charity model is also an old-fashioned model to work.

    I know, I could not make the vaccine for the novel Corona virus but I can teach people, to do research. I may need a guide or mentor but not hold my hands to walk. The time has already changed. But the DAs and big philanthropists are busy to show up their logos, to be popular and compete to make us paralysed.

    In this circumstance, the iconic people like you both, need to liberate from the preoccupied mind about us. You need to stand for breaking the stereotyped development and human right practices. It sounds insane but it is the truth and demand of today.

    Dear Greta and Djaffar,
    Let’s challenge ourselves and this world. If you do the same things as before there is no point to come up with new organizations and campaigns. Let’s join the hands from global south and north and change the narratives of development for the sake of people and planet. 

    Hope you both are open to discuss this matter. I also have so much to share about the discrepancies or controversies between you and me or global north and south and so many commonalities and possibilities to bring synergies. Hope you won’t overlook my request.  As the novel Corona virus taught us, we need to stop, we need to be slow and we need to think for the people and planet. All in all, are the members of the same family.

    Stay Safe !

    Sincerely,

    Anupa Regmi,    Nepal,   regmianupa17@gmail.com
    Milli Adhikari,    USA,      tadhikari@berkeley.edu
    Radha Paudel,   Nepal,   rpaudel456@gmail.com[:]

  • YouMAKE: Project Kick-Off in Nepal

    The kick-off meeting of the YouMAKE project, a follow-up project to YouLEAD, took place in Nepal from March 3rd to 9th. Due to a rule change, we were able to work with Monon e.U. no longer participate directly and the organization Grenzlos from Vienna took our place. However, since I was in Nepal anyway, I had the pleasure of attending the kickoff meeting and spending a day with the participants.

    Opening Conference at VHS Bhaktapur

    In my session, we dealt with the Sustainable Development Goals from the perspective of the World System Model and looked into the question of what contribution youth work can make to achieving the SDGs.

    The exciting conversations with a lot of exchange on the different realities of life in the different countries led us to 5 synergetic solution ideas, which can be implemented in youth work and which can simultaneously master the challenges of several nodes.

    You can find details about the program below

  • Paper Commentator Micro Finance Summit Nepal 2017

    [:en]P1030669 P1030669_smallFrom 15. – 17.3.2017 organized the Centre for Microfinance Nepal (CMF) the 4th Micro Finance Summit in Nepal. More that 800 representatives from Micro Finance Institutions and cooperatives gathered in Hotel Yak & Yeti to discuss the current status and future of Micro Finance in Nepal. I had the pleasure of being invited as a commentator on the paper, which gave the key slogan of the whole summit: „Balancing Financial, Social and Human Value“ published by Dr. Harihar Archarya on the case study of a woman lead and value oriented poverty alleviation model, which was facilitated by SAHAMATI.
    The case study gives the reader a detailed insight in the operative aspects of the micro financing model. What is the strength of this paper is also the limitation: it provides detailed insights in the internal organization, however, the methodology does not allow to answer the question, which aspects of the comprehensive intervention was causing the transformation in relationship with family, organization, society and nature. While formulating the research question, Dr. Archarya assumed, that the improved economic status was causing the uplift in the social relationship by asking: „Provided that their economic status is improved, is it possible to bring about significant transformation in social relationship [..]?“ Yet for me there are many evidences, that this transformation rather came from the interventions which accompanied the micro finance activity as a second effect of the program rather than assuming, that the intervention changed their economic status and their economic status transformed their social relationship.

    Yet the chosen methodology of the paper does not allow to answer the question of the causal effect. Yet to bring up this question I’ve referred in my talk to a comparative field experiment, which is described in Poor Economics (Banerjee, Duflo, 2011). The study has shown, that even though access to micro finance has increased the number of micro-businesses started and consumer goods available in a household their study has not detected that the pure access to finance has increased woman empowerment within the household or an improved access to health care or education. From this I would conclude, that is was not the financial change causing the social change, but rather the intervention of SAHAMATI causing both: an improved economic status as well as a social transformation.

    P1030672_smallAs the majority of the audience where the leaders and initiators of local micro financing initiatives, I’ve tried my best to summarise those conclusions in Nepali language. I continued, sharing the work from Dan Arieyl, who in his book Predictable Irrationality  summarised the findings of various experiments how there is something like social norms and something like market norms and how market norms have been show to actually put away social norms. Abhi Kaul, another speaker on that day, was talking about a new movement in Canada and the US „the spiritualisation of money“, which might be a realisation, that from monetising what has been done in social norms, the social norms get undermined.

    I concluded my comment with introducing the audience very briefly to the idea of impact measurement and the common good matrix, which which is a tool made to actually measure the impact of any organization in terms of the positive or negative impact of any organization on it’s different stakeholders and allows to put this in a comparative aspect. If i roughly apply this matrix to the activities of SAHAMATI I would see that many aspects of the democracy related indicators have been applied during the project implementation, which made the model so successful: inclusion of the „customer“ in product & service development, empowerment of the implementation partners, a set of feedback loops and more has given them back human dignity and provided a space to develop solidarity.

    The program ended with a set of questions from the audience in which several interesting questions where mentioned: One of it dealt with the question if a research fund should be established, which could help conducting more and in depth research on the impact of social business. Dr. Balram Duwal furthermore raised the direct question on how social business can be and is related to micro finance.

    Those micro finance institutions, which strive for bringing social change, are well advised to consider themselves social businesses and reflect on their social impact along all the lines. Without speaking it out SAHAMATI has been operating up to a high degree as a social business working along several principles, which looked way beyond the financial impact of their doing. The second relation between micro finance and social business is the question into which kind of business a micro business will grow, for the case it grows in terms of size and impact. Where a micro business always starts as a inward-oriented entity while growing into a social business a micro business needs to change at a certain stage of growth to turn its focus outward. This phenomenon I hope to be able to do more research on in future, is something I’ve named the inward-outward-paradigm shift.

    It was a great honor for me to be invited to contribute and share my thoughts in this program. I got inspired by he discussion and the energy which was present in the hall during the program. Same like for the rest of Nepal, I could feel the transition in the audience and a new way of thinking about the crucial community service micro finance institutions are playing in Nepal’s transformation. One positive aspect of the transformation was that the whole program was made accessible also to person not present on the day by being live streamed on Youtube. The link below is starting the live stream at the time, where my comment starts (mainly Nepali)

    https://youtu.be/E8j3qkSCL-E?t=3280

    I want to congratulate the center for Micro Finance and Dr. Harihar Archarya for this successful program and hope to be able to contribute in future again.

    Bibliography

    Ariely, Dan: Predictable Irrationality: The hidden forces, that shape our decisions; Harper Collins

    Banerjee, Abhijit V.; Duflo, Esther: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty; Random House India

     [:]

  • Summit in Vienna: Inspriation and Network

    Inge Patsch from Monon with Queen Sophia from Spain and Professor Mohammed Yunus
    Queen Sofia of Spain and Professor Yunus visiting Monon e.U.

    Inspiration, more clear visions and contacts to very interesting and committed persons are the three main things we took from the Global Social Business Summit 2012 last week in Vienna. At our booth in the ‚Space of Entrepreneurs‘ as well as during the breaks new ideas emerged together in discussions with other projects like Babele – an online platform for planning and financing of ideas in the field of social businesses, Hope Media – a new magazine in the area of social businesses – or for example the creation of a theater play for schools, which brings awareness for the zero-waste-movement into schools. Other participants of the space of entrepreneurs dealt with the issue of sustainable and power-saving lights like the campaign klares Licht or Variomondo – a social and ecological sustainable trading company which is operated as social business.

    I have been very pleased by the numerous visitors at our booth: Queen Sofia of Spain and Professor Muhammed Yunus as well as all the other visitors coming from various fields and showed interest in our activities. Throughout the manifold discussions and questions to the business idea behind Monon e.U. our concepts have been refined, sophisticated and in the same time simplified. I want therefore to thank everybody for all the critical questions, and especially Susanne for supporting me and giving me feedback again and again. All the inspiration and new thoughts will be reworked during the next weeks and will be integrated in our re-launched website, which will contain a simpler and clearer presentation of our products and services.

    Susanne and Inge at the Global Social Business Summit
    Susanne and Inge at the Global Social Business Summit. Thanks for the picture to Markus Feix from Variomondo

    But before this new concepts are published, Inge Patsch will leave next week for Nepal to work together with Anil Sapkota on the strategic development of the VHS Bhaktapur. During the upcoming 4 – 6 months I will as well make inquiries for other projects in Nepal and India and strengthen the contact to international organizations which are operating in this area. Last but not least, I’m looking forward to visiting the Yunus Center in Dhaka and hope that I can contribute to the establishing of their idea in Nepal.